Release Date: October 2nd, 2015 (UK); December 4th, 2015 (US)
Genre: Drama; War
Starring: Michael Fassbender, Marion Cotillard
Justin Kurzel’s ferocious take on Macbeth begins and ends with death. Though its Shakespearean format might isolate those who aren’t well-versed in the Bard’s prose, the film attains a degree of accessibility by dealing in brute force and thematic clarity. We see a Star Wars-esque information trail at the start, but this time the text is in blood red. Jed Kurzel, Justin’s brother, concocts a score that drills and hammers in tandem with bellowing battle cries, bestowing total discomfort upon us. Writers Todd Louiso, Jacob Koskoff, and Michael Lesslie opt to examine how the loss of innocence can incite the immoral side of power, and the results are unflinching.
Upon discovering he is destined to be king, Macbeth (Michael Fassbender) weighs up the immediacy of his sure-fire thronage. Lady Macbeth (Marion Cotillard) urges her husband to commit treasonous murder, to speed up the process by killing King Duncan (David Thewlis). Convinced, and perhaps driven by grief brought about by the death of his own child, the Thane of Scotland slays his superior. From then we see the man crumble, haunted by visions of dead clansmen he swore to protect in battle. He becomes a mad king increasingly propelled by unfettered impulsion and corrupted by power (“Full of scorpions, is my mind”).
Kurzel’s film will likely appeal to a specific audience; attempts to widen its potential reach are few and far between. Ye who enter devoid of prior knowledge, like myself, will have to contend with a movie that communicates entirely through the diction of Shakespeare. As such, it functions much in the same way a foreign language piece without subtitles would, which might alienate some viewers. It shouldn’t though. Blindly following the story is never too difficult as the actors offer a tangible, precise translation. It’s a testament to the performances of Fassbender and Cotillard in particular that the narrative is sold to us without a verbal parachute.
With Fassbender, it’s all in the eyes. His Macbeth, a brooding warrior at the fore, grows bags that darken beneath increasingly absent pupils as the pressure of sovereignty takes over. We never really know where we stand with him — his irreverent actions eventually hit a point of no return, but until then there’s a sorrowful tragedy surrounding Macbeth. In a case of role-reversal, it is Lady Macbeth who must take on the burden of regret. Cotillard is more subtle than her male counterpart. Her words, though often beautiful, are enshrouded in hysteria and pain; the camera unblinkingly lingers on her face during a scene towards the end as the actor speaks with utter command, evoking genuine heartbreak.
The framework from which the duo perform is comparable to how Eddie Redmayne and Felicity Jones navigated The Theory of Everything: one exercises true physicality while the other evokes a delicate-yet-purposeful poise. There is often a lingering stillness that is only interrupted by Fassbender’s increasingly perturbed movement, and only Cotillard has the guile to reign in said eccentricity. Friend-turned-foe Macduff, played by an emotionally-wrought Sean Harris, christens Macbeth the “Fiend of Scotland”.
Nicolas Winding Refn’s Valhalla Rising might have been a touchpoint for Kurzel, especially in a visual sense: the unquenchable mist, the moorish setting, the breadth of visceral savagery, all invoked. Battle scenes could very well be taking place among the Dead Marshes on the boggy road to Mordor. The Scottish setting, not unlike modern times, is always cloudy, or rainy, or dank, but the aesthetic is never mundane — fog is crimson coloured and dynamic. Cinematographer Adam Arkapaw mixes steady shots with a shaky cam effect, mirroring the vacillating levels of order and chaos afoot.
Arkapaw shot the soon-to-be iconic six-minute drug den raid in True Detective season one, and Macbeth revels in similar technical prowess. From sound, to look, to how the film is edited, it’s quite stunning. Scenes showing brutal murder, such as the death of King Duncan, are intercut with instances of solemn hush. A contrast is evident throughout, pitting light against dark (or perhaps it is dark against post-dark). The sound design is worth mentioning too: rallying howls echo with spine-tingling reverence around cavernous cathedral-like rooms.
To the credit of those on and off-screen, it never feels like we’re watching a play. In many ways this is a niche offering; much of the verbiage might not make sense, yet you can’t help but stare. And when what you’re staring at is this good, this impactful, words are almost inconsequential. Here are two more anyway: Hail Macbeth!
Images credit: IMP Awards, Collider
Images copyright (©): The Weinstein Company
Riveting review Adam, this movie needs to hurry up and get to my area already! If I had drafted up a top ten of my most anticipated this part of the year, Macbeth would probably slide in right behind Spectre and In the heart of the Sea. Looks and sounds like it’s going to be great.
Thanks Tom. I noticed that! Odd — you guys usually get the big movies before we do over here, haha! It’ll be worth the wait. I’m really looking forward to Spectre and In the Heart of the Sea too, exciting times.
P.S. Is the new font on my site okay for reading? Thought I’d change it up a bit.
I noticed the change, yeah! Nice. It’s perfectly readable, for sure. 🙂
Good stuff! 🙂
Loved this review, so descriptive and well-written. I’m definitely going to see this movie some time.
Much appreciated Vinnie. It’s a really well made, well acted film. Looking forward to reading your thoughts when you do.
I’ll be sure to let you know my feelings about it. I must say sorry for not being on your blog so much lately. I’ve been shaking things up on my site, with some naughty posts and expanding my taste. Feel free to comment whenever.
No bother Vinnie, ditto! Think I’ve got about five days of posts to catch up on. Will do!
Cheers, looking forward to hearing from you on my posts.
Fine stuff Adam. Not caught up with this yet but am looking forward to it. I’ve seen it on stage on several occasions and am intrigued by Fassbender’s portrayal.
Cheers Mark. I went in as the uncultured fool who’d never even read Macbeth, and the film still resonated brilliantly. Obviously I don’t another performance to compare him with but I felt Fassbender really delivered.
Great read mate. I too couldn’t understand a word of what was happening, but as you say the power of the acting and the directing made everything clear. I really want to see it again!
Thanks Jordan. Haha — there were a few walkouts in my screening, which I’m putting down to unfamiliarity with the Shakespearian oeuvre. I’d quite like to read the play and then see it again.
Me too. It was such a great movie to watch, I want to read a summary of the play so I know what is happening and then see it again before it disappears from the big screen. I’m impressed that you were still able to write some a comprehensive review mate!
Ach, you’re too kind Jordan! Maybe my subconscious Scottish self enabled me to understand more than I should’ve!
Haha maybe!! But seriously though great write-up, I couldn’t think of anything to write about it
Hahahaha, I love it – you won’t necessarily understand it always, but you will be riveted! Hoping we get this soon!
Let’s just say I’m not the too well-versed in the words of Shakespeare, haha!